How Use Camera On Galaxy A50

Please note: In October 2020, nosotros updated the DXOMARK Camera exam protocol. Version 4 now includes image preview tests and a wide range of new test scenes as part of our new trustability evaluation which measures the camera's ability to deliver consistent still prototype and video quality beyond all shooting scenarios. We have retested this device using the new version 4 of the test protocol and produced this completely updated review. For more data, please run into our article about preview, trustability and other version 4 updates of the DXOMARK Camera test protocol.

The Samsung Milky way A50 was launched in early 2019 as a feature-rich budget smartphone that included a big 6.4-inch AMOLED FHD+ brandish with a modest waterdrop notch and thin chin to ensure lots of screen real estate. It was as well one of the most powerful devices at this end of the market, running Android 9.0 on a Exynos 9610 chipset and featuring no fewer than three camera modules. The standard-broad camera was built around a 25 MP sensor that bins down to 12.two MP output coupled to a 26mm f/1.7 lens, with an 8 MP ultra-broad camera and a 5 MP depth sensor for bokeh shots.

Read on to find out how the Samsung Galaxy A50 performed nether the brand-new version four of the DXOMARK Camera exam protocol.

Update summary

Samsung Galaxy A50

camera

Securing an updated overall DXOMARK Camera score of 76 the Samsung Galaxy A50 is someway behind the latest devices for smartphone paradigm quality. Maybe non surprisingly this older device struggled under our more than challenging version 4 testing protocols. Its Photo score of 76 is almost l points backside the leader and particularly depression scores for night, bokeh and preview operation had an touch on. Achieving a Zoom score of 27, the A50 delivered ameliorate results in our ultra-wide analysis but without a dedicated tele-lens results were low in the tele category. A Video score of 67 is also the lowest achieved nether version 4 testing to appointment and although results for exposure, color and dissonance were acceptable, poor performance in autofocus and texture had an impact overall.

For an 18-calendar month-old budget device, the Samsung A50 put in a respectable performance under our challenging new testing regime. Noise is adequately well controlled in outdoor scenes, but the level of detail is low overall in all tested weather condition. Faces are well exposed in backlit atmospheric condition, and although target exposures are acceptable, dynamic range is express. Strong light-green white balance casts in outdoor images is a weakness, however, and the quality of zoom shots leaves a little to exist desired, with low detail and obvious colour casts. In our new and challenging test scenes that include more subject motion, nosotros also observed ghosting artifacts in some A50 images, which affected the concluding score.

Accurate target exposures and expert colour rendering on well counterbalanced outdoor images.

Well controlled noise in low light images only the level of detail is low.

Capturing videos, nosotros constitute exposure to be mostly accurate under stable lighting conditions indoors and outdoors. Exposure adaptation is slow as lighting conditions change, however, and dynamic range is limited in videos. Exposure on faces is pretty skillful, though, and skin tones are generally adequate in indoor movies. White balance is a little unstable, however, and so look to see a slight variation in colour casts and strong colour casts in outdoor videos in particular. Video detail is low in most conditions and luminance noise is visible in both indoor and low-light conditions. Autofocus tracking is likewise poor and the A50'south stabilization arrangement isn't very effective, with residuum motion and image deformation often visible when the camera is moving during recording.

Samsung Galaxy A50, outdoor video

Samsung Galaxy A50, indoor video

Preview

The A50 isn't a top performer for preview image quality, with stiff differences compared to capture in most situations, and although zoom smoothness is good, zoom range is very limited using pinch. With no live HDR, highlights in preview are always overexposed in high-contrast conditions. The on-screen "HDR ON" symbol gives some indication that HDR processing volition be applied in capture, which is useful, but processing isn't always practical when required. Faces are often exposed darker in capture, too. So for the nearly role, there are significant differences between preview and capture in outdoor and indoor conditions. Exposure representation is amend in low light, but a loss of texture and additional noise is oft visible in preview nether poor lighting.

Preview: highlights are clipped in high-contrast scenes, merely the "HDR ON" symbol indicates that additional processing will be practical.

Capture: loftier-contrast exposures are more successful with HDR processing applied, simply preview isn't capable of displaying this prototype.

Bokeh rendering oft differs considerably between preview and capture as well. Depth estimation is poor in preview, indicating pregnant subject partitioning errors and a terribly patchy mistiness gradient effect on objects at unlike distances behind the portrait. Consistency could exist improved, too, every bit the bokeh consequence is sometimes activated in preview but then not applied in capture. This is annoying, and particularly so when the "upshot ready" confirmation appears on screen and the effect nevertheless isn't applied.

Preview: inaccurate depth interpretation renders subject sectionalization errors and a patchy blur slope effect.

Capture: the resulting shots are often much more successful, but the bokeh effect isn't e'er practical even when it's visible in preview and the "effect ready" confirmation appears.

Using compression zoom, stable exposure, color, focus, and field of view ensure good performance, but the zoom range is very express (between 1x to 4x magnification). Information technology's necessary to use the on-screen buttons to switch between the A50's wide and primary cameras, and the device is very wearisome to adapt, taking around a second to bring the paradigm into focus.

Samsung Galaxy A50, zoom preview

Samsung Galaxy A50 camera review (originally published July 4, 2019)

Launched in February 2019, the Milky way A50 is a characteristic-rich, budget smartphone that includes a big six.four-inch AMOLED FHD+ display with a small waterdrop notch and a sparse chin, thus providing lots of screen existent estate. With an Exynos 9610 chipset running Android 9.0, the Milky way A50 is ane of the most powerful devices at this stop of the market place. The photography proposition offers not ane, but iii cameras on the rear of the device: a 25Mp sensor coupled to a 26mm f/ane.7 lens for the main camera, an 8Mp ultra-wide camera, and a 5Mp depth-sensing sensor for bokeh shots. Read on to observe out how the Samsung Galaxy A50 camera performs against the competition in our in-depth review.

Key camera specifications:

Triple-camera setup
Main: 25Mp sensor with 26mm-equivalent f/i.7 lens
Ultra-wide: 8Mp sensor with 13mm-equivalent f/2.2 lens
5Mp depth-sensing sensor with f/2.2 lens
PDAF autofocus
LED flash
1080p/30fps video

Nigh DxOMark Mobile tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone photographic camera reviews, DxOMark engineers capture and evaluate over 1500 examination images and more than than 2 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera'due south default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information virtually the DxOMark Mobile exam protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here.

Test summary

Achieving an overall DxOMark Mobile score of 83 points, the Samsung Galaxy A50 does not rank at the very top of our database of smartphone image quality, just is but 3 points behind last twelvemonth'southward Galaxy A9. The A50's functioning is also on par with much older flagship devices, such equally the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge (82 points) and the Apple iPhone 7 (85 points).

Securing a Photo score of 85 points, the A50 does well for stills, specially in bright sunny conditions, with skillful exposures, dainty color rendering, and generally accurate white remainder ensuring pleasant pictures.

In bright outdoor lighting atmospheric condition, the Samsung Milky way A50 captures very pleasant images with accurate exposure and vibrant color.

Shooting in tricky loftier-contrast weather condition, the A50 offers wide dynamic range, with effective HDR rendering ensuring well-preserved detail in both the highlight and shadow regions in our "nether the bridge" test scene. In fact, the shadow recovery in some of the A50's HDR shots offered a slight improvement over the more expensive competition. Although a niggling chromatic noise, equally well as ringing and aliasing edge artifacts are visible at close inspection, the A50 does a skilful task on HDR shots overall.

Samsung Galaxy A50, high-contrast scene

LG G8, high-dissimilarity scene

Apple iPhone 8 Plus, high-contrast scene

Portrait mode is another positive aspect for the A50, thanks to the defended depth-sensing sensor's reasonably accurate depth estimation and subject masking when applying background blur to portraits. It's non perfect, with some edge artifacts and abrupt transitions in the blur gradient visible when examining images at large scale. These are less obvious when viewing images on the device'due south brandish, however, and the A50 did a amend job of isolating complex details such every bit the spectacles in our test portrait compared to the Samsung Galaxy A9 or LG G8. The A50 applies a prissy circular shape to background spotlights, too, and although bokeh shots tin can lack a little contrast, with slightly done-out color, the overall upshot remains by and large pleasant.

Samsung Galaxy A50, bokeh simulation

Samsung Milky way A9, bokeh simulation

The main areas for improvement are depression levels of particular preservation in all weather condition and peculiarly with zoom shots, besides as disappointing results in cloudy outdoor scenes and lower calorie-free conditions generally. We observed several failures in clouded outdoor weather, including a fairly stiff green colour cast and a heavier build-upwards of luminance noise in flat areas, with lower levels of detail in intricate areas than we'd expect to see in outdoor images. In fact, item preservation is i of the A50'due south master weaknesses, with fine localized item rarely rendered well in any lighting conditions.

Samsung Galaxy A50, cloudy outdoor conditions

LG G8, cloudy outdoor conditions

Apple iPhone 8 Plus, cloudy outdoor atmospheric condition

Apple iPhone eight Plus, ingather

Opting for an ultra-wide-angle second photographic camera on the A50 may show popular with those photographers looking to squeeze more into the frame, merely it also ways there'due south no tele-lens for improved zoom shots. Consequently, while the A50 offers a digital zoom solution up to a maximum 4x magnification, the results are some ways off the pace of what you tin expect from the proficient performers. Fifty-fifty at shut range (approximately 2x magnification), a significant loss of item is visible, with unnatural rendering oft axiomatic in intricate areas. At medium range (approximately 4x magnification), other bug such as ringing and denoising artifacts, a heavy build-upwards of dissonance, and poor colour rendering farther reduce the quality of the A50'south zoom shots.

Samsung Galaxy A50, close-range zoom

Samsung A9, close-range zoom

Flash operation is a strength for the A50, and although target exposures are a little high for both flash-only and mixed lighting shots, they remain adequate and ensure nice vivid results. Corner shading is reasonably well-controlled, also, but there is a strong divergence in the level of noise betwixt the center and corners of the frame in flash shots in which the edges have been brightened by prototype processing. Some luminance noise is also visible on faces in the centre of the frame, but information technology is handled amend there than in the corners. White residuum is fairly neutral in flash shots, besides, and although some slight desaturation is axiomatic in flash-only shots, overall color rendering remains adequate.

Our testers also found some epitome artifacts. The nigh problematic is ghosting, where subjects with even moderate movement often announced with a double prototype. We besides found some ringing, flare, noisy edges, and geometric shifts where lines and patterns don't quite line up in some of our sample images.

Samsung Galaxy A50, ghosting artifact with subject move

Samsung Galaxy A50, geometric shift antiquity

Tested under controlled conditions in the lab, the A50's PDAF autofocus organization performed well, consistently delivering in-focus images. It's not the fastest we've tested, but its response times of effectually 100ms in our outdoor (thousand lux) shots and indoor (300 lux) shots are well within acceptable limits. It was slower in low light (twenty lux), oftentimes taking effectually 500ms (0.5 2d) for the focus to lock on, which will arrive a little more challenging to quickly grab a well-focused shot when the light is poor.

Samsung Galaxy A50, autofocus performance in bright light (1000 lux)

The A50 achieves a Video score of 79 points. Its principal strengths for movies are pleasant color with generally accurate white balance, and well-controlled noise in both outdoor and indoor lighting weather—although both colour and dissonance control deteriorate noticeably in very low lite. Racket is especially well-controlled in apartment areas of uniform color, where a visible build-up of luminance noise is often distracting in smartphone videos. On the A50, a coarse racket becomes visible only in depression-low-cal videos.

Samsung A50, color rendering analysis by lighting condition

Target exposures are generally authentic and pleasant in the A50's videos, also, so over again, it's but in low-light conditions between 1 and 20 lux where serious under-exposure becomes obvious. We observed some exposure instabilities in all conditions, however, and dynamic range is very limited, then you'd exist best off seeking more balanced lighting conditions when shooting video.

Samsung A50, video target exposure analysis past lighting status

The master areas for comeback with video business organisation autofocus, detail, and stabilization. Autofocus instabilities are common, with frequent and unnecessary refocusing easily triggered by small changes in the scene, and autofocus tracking is relatively poor in all lighting conditions. The A50's stabilization organization is adequately effective for static handheld videos and with moderate panning movements, but recording while walking results in potent judders and residue high-frequency motion with every step. Particular is also low generally, with visible differences in the sharpness between frames; and obvious artifacts affect the integrity of videos particularly indoors and in low light.

Samsung Galaxy A50 outdoor video

Determination

Packing a big 6.4-inch AMOLED brandish, the Exynos 9610 chipset, and a triple-camera setup, the Samsung Galaxy A50 has plenty for the budget-conscious smartphone enthusiast to get excited most. Under the rigors of our rear-camera testing, however, the A50 can't match the performance of some of the best mid-range devices and certainly not the prototype quality of the latest flagship offerings. It'due south best in brilliant sunny conditions, where exposure, dynamic range, and color are good, and bokeh shots are very adequate. In cloudy or depression-light weather, though, it's non quite every bit constructive with stills or video, and we establish zoom shots to be a particular weakness.

Pros

Bright and pleasant color in bright sunny conditions
Quite wide dynamic range
More often than not fast and repeatable autofocus
Well-exposed faces in backlit conditions
Good color and authentic white balance using flash
Pleasant color outdoors and indoors (Video)
Well-controlled racket outdoors and indoors (Video)
Fairly efficient stabilization of static handheld videos (Video)

Cons

Low level of detail
Autofocus failures in depression light
Low item and colour casts in zoom shots
Green and pinkish color casts outdoors and indoors
Geometric shift artifacts and localized low detail artifacts oft visible
Slightly loftier target exposure using flash
Autofocus instabilities with frequent refocusing and overshooting (Video)
Stiff residuum loftier-frequency movement visible with walking motility (Video)
Depression level of detail (Video)
Visible exposure instabilities in all conditions (Video)
Fibroid noise artifacts in low low-cal (Video)
Scene integrity artifacts under indoor and depression-lite conditions (Video)

In the Press

Source: https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-a50-camera-review/

Posted by: summeyarmorthavins51.blogspot.com

How Use Camera On Galaxy A50

Update summary

Preview

Samsung Galaxy A50 camera review (originally published July 4, 2019)

Test summary

Determination

Pros

Cons

In the Press

0 Response to "How Use Camera On Galaxy A50"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel